The Mysterious Affair at Styles - 13 - last part in English Thriller by Agatha Christie books and stories PDF | The Mysterious Affair at Styles - 13 - last part

Featured Books
Categories
Share

The Mysterious Affair at Styles - 13 - last part

The Mysterious Affair at Styles

by Agatha Christie

POIROT EXPLAINS

CHAPTER XIII.

“Poirot, you old villain,” I said, “I’ve half a mind to strangle you!

What do you mean by deceiving me as you have done?”

We were sitting in the library. Several hectic days lay behind us. In

the room below, John and Mary were together once more, while Alfred

Inglethorp and Miss Howard were in custody. Now at last, I had Poirot

to myself, and could relieve my still burning curiosity.

Poirot did not answer me for a moment, but at last he said:

“I did not deceive you, _mon ami_. At most, I permitted you to deceive

yourself.”

“Yes, but why?”

“Well, it is difficult to explain. You see, my friend, you have a

nature so honest, and a countenance so transparent, that—_enfin_, to

conceal your feelings is impossible! If I had told you my ideas, the

very first time you saw Mr. Alfred Inglethorp that astute gentleman

would have—in your so expressive idiom—‘smelt a rat’! And then,

_bonjour_ to our chances of catching him!”

“I think that I have more diplomacy than you give me credit for.”

“My friend,” besought Poirot, “I implore you, do not enrage yourself!

Your help has been of the most invaluable. It is but the extremely

beautiful nature that you have, which made me pause.”

“Well,” I grumbled, a little mollified. “I still think you might have

given me a hint.”

“But I did, my friend. Several hints. You would not take them. Think

now, did I ever say to you that I believed John Cavendish guilty? Did I

not, on the contrary, tell you that he would almost certainly be

acquitted?”

“Yes, but——”

“And did I not immediately afterwards speak of the difficulty of

bringing the murderer to justice? Was it not plain to you that I was

speaking of two entirely different persons?”

“No,” I said, “it was not plain to me!”

“Then again,” continued Poirot, “at the beginning, did I not repeat to

you several times that I didn’t want Mr. Inglethorp arrested _now_?

That should have conveyed something to you.”

“Do you mean to say you suspected him as long ago as that?”

“Yes. To begin with, whoever else might benefit by Mrs. Inglethorp’s

death, her husband would benefit the most. There was no getting away

from that. When I went up to Styles with you that first day, I had no

idea as to how the crime had been committed, but from what I knew of

Mr. Inglethorp I fancied that it would be very hard to find anything to

connect him with it. When I arrived at the château, I realized at once

that it was Mrs. Inglethorp who had burnt the will; and there, by the

way, you cannot complain, my friend, for I tried my best to force on

you the significance of that bedroom fire in midsummer.”

“Yes, yes,” I said impatiently. “Go on.”

“Well, my friend, as I say, my views as to Mr. Inglethorp’s guilt were

very much shaken. There was, in fact, so much evidence against him that

I was inclined to believe that he had not done it.”

“When did you change your mind?”

“When I found that the more efforts I made to clear him, the more

efforts he made to get himself arrested. Then, when I discovered that

Inglethorp had nothing to do with Mrs. Raikes and that in fact it was

John Cavendish who was interested in that quarter, I was quite sure.”

“But why?”

“Simply this. If it had been Inglethorp who was carrying on an intrigue

with Mrs. Raikes, his silence was perfectly comprehensible. But, when I

discovered that it was known all over the village that it was John who

was attracted by the farmer’s pretty wife, his silence bore quite a

different interpretation. It was nonsense to pretend that he was afraid

of the scandal, as no possible scandal could attach to him. This

attitude of his gave me furiously to think, and I was slowly forced to

the conclusion that Alfred Inglethorp wanted to be arrested. _Eh bien!_

from that moment, I was equally determined that he should not be

arrested.”

“Wait a minute. I don’t see why he wished to be arrested?”

“Because, _mon ami_, it is the law of your country that a man once

acquitted can never be tried again for the same offence. Aha! but it

was clever—his idea! Assuredly, he is a man of method. See here, he

knew that in his position he was bound to be suspected, so he conceived

the exceedingly clever idea of preparing a lot of manufactured evidence

against himself. He wished to be arrested. He would then produce his

irreproachable alibi—and, hey presto, he was safe for life!”

“But I still don’t see how he managed to prove his alibi, and yet go to

the chemist’s shop?”

Poirot stared at me in surprise.

“Is it possible? My poor friend! You have not yet realized that it was

Miss Howard who went to the chemist’s shop?”

“Miss Howard?”

“But, certainly. Who else? It was most easy for her. She is of a good

height, her voice is deep and manly; moreover, remember, she and

Inglethorp are cousins, and there is a distinct resemblance between

them, especially in their gait and bearing. It was simplicity itself.

They are a clever pair!”

“I am still a little fogged as to how exactly the bromide business was

done,” I remarked.

“_Bon!_ I will reconstruct for you as far as possible. I am inclined to

think that Miss Howard was the master mind in that affair. You remember

her once mentioning that her father was a doctor? Possibly she

dispensed his medicines for him, or she may have taken the idea from

one of the many books lying about when Mademoiselle Cynthia was

studying for her exam. Anyway, she was familiar with the fact that the

addition of a bromide to a mixture containing strychnine would cause

the precipitation of the latter. Probably the idea came to her quite

suddenly. Mrs. Inglethorp had a box of bromide powders, which she

occasionally took at night. What could be easier than quietly to

dissolve one or more of those powders in Mrs. Inglethorp’s large sized

bottle of medicine when it came from Coot’s? The risk is practically

nil. The tragedy will not take place until nearly a fortnight later. If

anyone has seen either of them touching the medicine, they will have

forgotten it by that time. Miss Howard will have engineered her

quarrel, and departed from the house. The lapse of time, and her

absence, will defeat all suspicion. Yes, it was a clever idea! If they

had left it alone, it is possible the crime might never have been

brought home to them. But they were not satisfied. They tried to be too

clever—and that was their undoing.”

Poirot puffed at his tiny cigarette, his eyes fixed on the ceiling.

“They arranged a plan to throw suspicion on John Cavendish, by buying

strychnine at the village chemist’s, and signing the register in his

hand-writing.

“On Monday Mrs. Inglethorp will take the last dose of her medicine. On

Monday, therefore, at six o’clock, Alfred Inglethorp arranges to be

seen by a number of people at a spot far removed from the village. Miss

Howard has previously made up a cock and bull story about him and Mrs.

Raikes to account for his holding his tongue afterwards. At six

o’clock, Miss Howard, disguised as Alfred Inglethorp, enters the

chemist’s shop, with her story about a dog, obtains the strychnine, and

writes the name of Alfred Inglethorp in John’s handwriting, which she

had previously studied carefully.

“But, as it will never do if John, too, can prove an alibi, she writes

him an anonymous note—still copying his hand-writing—which takes him to

a remote spot where it is exceedingly unlikely that anyone will see

him.

“So far, all goes well. Miss Howard goes back to Middlingham. Alfred

Inglethorp returns to Styles. There is nothing that can compromise him

in any way, since it is Miss Howard who has the strychnine, which,

after all, is only wanted as a blind to throw suspicion on John

Cavendish.

“But now a hitch occurs. Mrs. Inglethorp does not take her medicine

that night. The broken bell, Cynthia’s absence—arranged by Inglethorp

through his wife—all these are wasted. And then—he makes his slip.

“Mrs. Inglethorp is out, and he sits down to write to his accomplice,

who, he fears, may be in a panic at the non-success of their plan. It

is probable that Mrs. Inglethorp returned earlier than he expected.

Caught in the act, and somewhat flurried he hastily shuts and locks his

desk. He fears that if he remains in the room he may have to open it

again, and that Mrs. Inglethorp might catch sight of the letter before

he could snatch it up. So he goes out and walks in the woods, little

dreaming that Mrs. Inglethorp will open his desk, and discover the

incriminating document.

“But this, as we know, is what happened. Mrs. Inglethorp reads it, and

becomes aware of the perfidy of her husband and Evelyn Howard, though,

unfortunately, the sentence about the bromides conveys no warning to

her mind. She knows that she is in danger—but is ignorant of where the

danger lies. She decides to say nothing to her husband, but sits down

and writes to her solicitor, asking him to come on the morrow, and she

also determines to destroy immediately the will which she has just

made. She keeps the fatal letter.”

“It was to discover that letter, then, that her husband forced the lock

of the despatch-case?”

“Yes, and from the enormous risk he ran we can see how fully he

realized its importance. That letter excepted, there was absolutely

nothing to connect him with the crime.”

“There’s only one thing I can’t make out, why didn’t he destroy it at

once when he got hold of it?”

“Because he did not dare take the biggest risk of all—that of keeping

it on his own person.”

“I don’t understand.”

“Look at it from his point of view. I have discovered that there were

only five short minutes in which he could have taken it—the five

minutes immediately before our own arrival on the scene, for before

that time Annie was brushing the stairs, and would have seen anyone who

passed going to the right wing. Figure to yourself the scene! He enters

the room, unlocking the door by means of one of the other doorkeys—they

were all much alike. He hurries to the despatch-case—it is locked, and

the keys are nowhere to be seen. That is a terrible blow to him, for it

means that his presence in the room cannot be concealed as he had

hoped. But he sees clearly that everything must be risked for the sake

of that damning piece of evidence. Quickly, he forces the lock with a

penknife, and turns over the papers until he finds what he is looking

for.

“But now a fresh dilemma arises: he dare not keep that piece of paper

on him. He may be seen leaving the room—he may be searched. If the

paper is found on him, it is certain doom. Probably, at this minute,

too, he hears the sounds below of Mr. Wells and John leaving the

boudoir. He must act quickly. Where can he hide this terrible slip of

paper? The contents of the waste-paper-basket are kept and in any case,

are sure to be examined. There are no means of destroying it; and he

dare not keep it. He looks round, and he sees—what do you think, _mon

ami?_”

I shook my head.

“In a moment, he has torn the letter into long thin strips, and rolling

them up into spills he thrusts them hurriedly in amongst the other

spills in the vase on the mantle-piece.”

I uttered an exclamation.

“No one would think of looking there,” Poirot continued. “And he will

be able, at his leisure, to come back and destroy this solitary piece

of evidence against him.”

“Then, all the time, it was in the spill vase in Mrs. Inglethorp’s

bedroom, under our very noses?” I cried.

Poirot nodded.

“Yes, my friend. That is where I discovered my ‘last link,’ and I owe

that very fortunate discovery to you.”

“To me?”

“Yes. Do you remember telling me that my hand shook as I was

straightening the ornaments on the mantelpiece?”

“Yes, but I don’t see——”

“No, but I saw. Do you know, my friend, I remembered that earlier in

the morning, when we had been there together, I had straightened all

the objects on the mantelpiece. And, if they were already straightened,

there would be no need to straighten them again, unless, in the

meantime, someone else had touched them.”

“Dear me,” I murmured, “so that is the explanation of your

extraordinary behaviour. You rushed down to Styles, and found it still

there?”

“Yes, and it was a race for time.”

“But I still can’t understand why Inglethorp was such a fool as to

leave it there when he had plenty of opportunity to destroy it.”

“Ah, but he had no opportunity. _I_ saw to that.”

“You?”

“Yes. Do you remember reproving me for taking the household into my

confidence on the subject?”

“Yes.”

“Well, my friend, I saw there was just one chance. I was not sure then

if Inglethorp was the criminal or not, but if he was I reasoned that he

would not have the paper on him, but would have hidden it somewhere,

and by enlisting the sympathy of the household I could effectually

prevent his destroying it. He was already under suspicion, and by

making the matter public I secured the services of about ten amateur

detectives, who would be watching him unceasingly, and being himself

aware of their watchfulness he would not dare seek further to destroy

the document. He was therefore forced to depart from the house, leaving

it in the spill vase.”

“But surely Miss Howard had ample opportunities of aiding him.”

“Yes, but Miss Howard did not know of the paper’s existence. In

accordance with their prearranged plan, she never spoke to Alfred

Inglethorp. They were supposed to be deadly enemies, and until John

Cavendish was safely convicted they neither of them dared risk a

meeting. Of course I had a watch kept on Mr. Inglethorp, hoping that

sooner or later he would lead me to the hiding-place. But he was too

clever to take any chances. The paper was safe where it was; since no

one had thought of looking there in the first week, it was not likely

they would do so afterwards. But for your lucky remark, we might never

have been able to bring him to justice.”

“I understand that now; but when did you first begin to suspect Miss

Howard?”

“When I discovered that she had told a lie at the inquest about the

letter she had received from Mrs. Inglethorp.”

“Why, what was there to lie about?”

“You saw that letter? Do you recall its general appearance?”

“Yes—more or less.”

“You will recollect, then, that Mrs. Inglethorp wrote a very

distinctive hand, and left large clear spaces between her words. But if

you look at the date at the top of the letter you will notice that

‘July 17th’ is quite different in this respect. Do you see what I

mean?”

“No,” I confessed, “I don’t.”

“You do not see that that letter was not written on the 17th, but on

the 7th—the day after Miss Howard’s departure? The ‘1’ was written in

before the ‘7’ to turn it into the ‘17th’.”

“But why?”

“That is exactly what I asked myself. Why does Miss Howard suppress the

letter written on the 17th, and produce this faked one instead? Because

she did not wish to show the letter of the 17th. Why, again? And at

once a suspicion dawned in my mind. You will remember my saying that it

was wise to beware of people who were not telling you the truth.”

“And yet,” I cried indignantly, “after that, you gave me two reasons

why Miss Howard could not have committed the crime!”

“And very good reasons too,” replied Poirot. “For a long time they were

a stumbling-block to me until I remembered a very significant fact:

that she and Alfred Inglethorp were cousins. She could not have

committed the crime single-handed, but the reasons against that did not

debar her from being an accomplice. And, then, there was that rather

over-vehement hatred of hers! It concealed a very opposite emotion.

There was, undoubtedly, a tie of passion between them long before he

came to Styles. They had already arranged their infamous plot—that he

should marry this rich, but rather foolish old lady, induce her to make

a will leaving her money to him, and then gain their ends by a very

cleverly conceived crime. If all had gone as they planned, they would

probably have left England, and lived together on their poor victim’s

money.

“They are a very astute and unscrupulous pair. While suspicion was to

be directed against him, she would be making quiet preparations for a

very different _dénouement_. She arrives from Middlingham with all the

compromising items in her possession. No suspicion attaches to her. No

notice is paid to her coming and going in the house. She hides the

strychnine and glasses in John’s room. She puts the beard in the attic.

She will see to it that sooner or later they are duly discovered.”

“I don’t quite see why they tried to fix the blame on John,” I

remarked. “It would have been much easier for them to bring the crime

home to Lawrence.”

“Yes, but that was mere chance. All the evidence against him arose out

of pure accident. It must, in fact, have been distinctly annoying to

the pair of schemers.”

“His manner was unfortunate,” I observed thoughtfully.

“Yes. You realize, of course, what was at the back of that?”

“No.”

“You did not understand that he believed Mademoiselle Cynthia guilty of

the crime?”

“No,” I exclaimed, astonished. “Impossible!”

“Not at all. I myself nearly had the same idea. It was in my mind when

I asked Mr. Wells that first question about the will. Then there were

the bromide powders which she had made up, and her clever male

impersonations, as Dorcas recounted them to us. There was really more

evidence against her than anyone else.”

“You are joking, Poirot!”

“No. Shall I tell you what made Monsieur Lawrence turn so pale when he

first entered his mother’s room on the fatal night? It was because,

whilst his mother lay there, obviously poisoned, he saw, over your

shoulder, that the door into Mademoiselle Cynthia’s room was unbolted.”

“But he declared that he saw it bolted!” I cried.

“Exactly,” said Poirot dryly. “And that was just what confirmed my

suspicion that it was not. He was shielding Mademoiselle Cynthia.”

“But why should he shield her?”

“Because he is in love with her.”

I laughed.

“There, Poirot, you are quite wrong! I happen to know for a fact that,

far from being in love with her, he positively dislikes her.”

“Who told you that, _mon ami?_”

“Cynthia herself.”

“_La pauvre petite!_ And she was concerned?”

“She said that she did not mind at all.”

“Then she certainly did mind very much,” remarked Poirot. “They are

like that—_les femmes!_”

“What you say about Lawrence is a great surprise to me,” I said.

“But why? It was most obvious. Did not Monsieur Lawrence make the sour

face every time Mademoiselle Cynthia spoke and laughed with his

brother? He had taken it into his long head that Mademoiselle Cynthia

was in love with Monsieur John. When he entered his mother’s room, and

saw her obviously poisoned, he jumped to the conclusion that

Mademoiselle Cynthia knew something about the matter. He was nearly

driven desperate. First he crushed the coffee-cup to powder under his

feet, remembering that _she_ had gone up with his mother the night

before, and he determined that there should be no chance of testing its

contents. Thenceforward, he strenuously, and quite uselessly, upheld

the theory of ‘Death from natural causes’.”

“And what about the ‘extra coffee-cup’?”

“I was fairly certain that it was Mrs. Cavendish who had hidden it, but

I had to make sure. Monsieur Lawrence did not know at all what I meant;

but, on reflection, he came to the conclusion that if he could find an

extra coffee-cup anywhere his lady love would be cleared of suspicion.

And he was perfectly right.”

“One thing more. What did Mrs. Inglethorp mean by her dying words?”

“They were, of course, an accusation against her husband.”

“Dear me, Poirot,” I said with a sigh, “I think you have explained

everything. I am glad it has all ended so happily. Even John and his

wife are reconciled.”

“Thanks to me.”

“How do you mean—thanks to you?”

“My dear friend, do you not realize that it was simply and solely the

trial which has brought them together again? That John Cavendish still

loved his wife, I was convinced. Also, that she was equally in love

with him. But they had drifted very far apart. It all arose from a

misunderstanding. She married him without love. He knew it. He is a

sensitive man in his way, he would not force himself upon her if she

did not want him. And, as he withdrew, her love awoke. But they are

both unusually proud, and their pride held them inexorably apart. He

drifted into an entanglement with Mrs. Raikes, and she deliberately

cultivated the friendship of Dr. Bauerstein. Do you remember the day of

John Cavendish’s arrest, when you found me deliberating over a big

decision?”

“Yes, I quite understood your distress.”

“Pardon me, _mon ami_, but you did not understand it in the least. I

was trying to decide whether or not I would clear John Cavendish at

once. I could have cleared him—though it might have meant a failure to

convict the real criminals. They were entirely in the dark as to my

real attitude up to the very last moment—which partly accounts for my

success.”

“Do you mean that you could have saved John Cavendish from being

brought to trial?”

“Yes, my friend. But I eventually decided in favour of ‘a woman’s

happiness’. Nothing but the great danger through which they have passed

could have brought these two proud souls together again.”

I looked at Poirot in silent amazement. The colossal cheek of the

little man! Who on earth but Poirot would have thought of a trial for

murder as a restorer of conjugal happiness!

“I perceive your thoughts, _mon ami_,” said Poirot, smiling at me. “No

one but Hercule Poirot would have attempted such a thing! And you are

wrong in condemning it. The happiness of one man and one woman is the

greatest thing in all the world.”

His words took me back to earlier events. I remembered Mary as she lay

white and exhausted on the sofa, listening, listening. There had come

the sound of the bell below. She had started up. Poirot had opened the

door, and meeting her agonized eyes had nodded gently. “Yes, madame,”

he said. “I have brought him back to you.” He had stood aside, and as I

went out I had seen the look in Mary’s eyes, as John Cavendish had

caught his wife in his arms.

“Perhaps you are right, Poirot,” I said gently. “Yes, it is the

greatest thing in the world.”

Suddenly, there was a tap at the door, and Cynthia peeped in.

“I—I only——”

“Come in,” I said, springing up.

She came in, but did not sit down.

“I—only wanted to tell you something——”

“Yes?”

Cynthia fidgeted with a little tassel for some moments, then, suddenly

exclaiming: “You dears!” kissed first me and then Poirot, and rushed

out of the room again.

“What on earth does this mean?” I asked, surprised.

It was very nice to be kissed by Cynthia, but the publicity of the

salute rather impaired the pleasure.

“It means that she has discovered Monsieur Lawrence does not dislike

her as much as she thought,” replied Poirot philosophically.

“But——”

“Here he is.”

Lawrence at that moment passed the door.

“Eh! Monsieur Lawrence,” called Poirot. “We must congratulate you, is

it not so?”

Lawrence blushed, and then smiled awkwardly. A man in love is a sorry

spectacle. Now Cynthia had looked charming.

I sighed.

“What is it, _mon ami?_”

“Nothing,” I said sadly. “They are two delightful women!”

“And neither of them is for you?” finished Poirot. “Never mind. Console

yourself, my friend. We may hunt together again, who knows? And then——”

THE END